Home » Life & Introspection, Science

The Quackometer on Homeopathic Medicine

8 May 2008 2 Comments

A terrific article on the "Quackometer" here [LINK]. It talks about the lack of clinical testing and scientific evidence to backup the incredible claims made by the alternative medicine community.

Why do I care about this? Actually normally I wouldn’t care. Just that Karen has cancer.

When a loved one is ill, you’ll do anything to improve the situation. When Karen was diagnosed (over a year ago), I quickly set about researching her form of cancer, trying to uncover a potential cure or complimentary therapy.

I quickly became overwhelmed with information. Let me give you the rundown of *crap* I uncovered as potential cancer cures:

  • Reishi Mushrooms
  • Reiki (laying on of hands)
  • Flax seed + Cottage Cheese
  • Fish Oils
  • Essiac Tea
  • Green Tea
  • Pomegranate
  • Turmeric
  • Feng Shui
  • Homeopathy
  • Fresh Cell Therapy
  • Naturopathy
  • Immuno-augmentative therapy
  • Shark Cartilage

Now let me tell you what I’ve discovered…IT’S…ALL…B*LLSH1T!!!

That’s right. Bullshit. There is no clinical peer-reviewed evidence of the efficacy of any of this *crap*.

There are two types of people preying on the cancer community: BS artists and Con artists. The first are ignorant morons, the latter are insidious opportunists.

I have every reason in the world to want this stuff to work. So does just about every cancer patient or caregiver. That makes us easy targets.

Not only do they prey on the victim’s finances, more importantly they offer false hope to a group of people who are already at their most vulnerable. To which hope is needed most.

If these therapies had even a PERCENTAGE of the efficacy they claim, it would make sense then that every cancer treatment regime would factor them in. The response to this typically is that the pharma industry actively dis-credits these alternative medicines in an effort to push their drugs. Sorry, that’s just plain false.  As Mark Twain said (paraphrasing) "A lie will journey around the world before the truth has put on its shoes".

Lastly and most deplorable, each of these therapies has its own chemistry. By introducing additional moving parts into the mix you run the risk of lessening the effect of clinically proven therapies.

I liked the following quote which was actually focused on prayer as a therapy (not the focus of this posting).
This pithy quote came from a cancer patient:

"Jesus is great but don’t try Jesus without Chemo".



    Have to say Fran that as a qualified dietitian / clinical nutritionist I wholeheartedly agree with your comments about the quackery being foisted on cancer patients, and indeed many other grps of patients on an ongoing basis. Many of these ‘ treatments’ may not only not work but as you say they may actually interfere with the work of the chemo drugs. We frequently come up against individuals who have tried quack diets in an effort to fight their cancer, but which are actually depriving them of valuable nutrients at a time when they need them most. Good to see you are promoting the search for evidence that is backed up by proper randomised controlled clinical trials. Keep up the good fight that Karen and you are fighting – Jesus and chemo seem to be working!

  • healme said:


Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.